[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: operation x=x(:)
From: |
heberf |
Subject: |
Re: operation x=x(:) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 1999 19:31:27 -0500 (CDT) |
I agree that when there is a choice we should go with MATLAB compatibility.
The
reason is that this is what sets Octave apart from similar projects. Scilab is
a good piece of code as well but not as MATLAB compatible as Octave. For
myself
it doesn't make a lot of difference because I don't even have MATLAB on my
machine. However when I share code with colleagues it's nice to have something
that will run on MATLAB as well.
There is a downside to this since MATLAB doesn't do everything the right way so
bug-for-bug compatibility may not be desirable.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Heber Farnsworth
Assistant Professor of Finance
John M. Olin School of Business
Washington University
Campus Box 1133 phone: (314) 935-4221
One Brookings Drive FAX: (314) 935-6359
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
- Re: operation x=x(:), (continued)
- Re: operation x=x(:), Wonkoo Kim, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), John W. Eaton, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), Mike Miller, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), John Logsdon, 1999/05/06
- Re: operation x=x(:), Ted Harding, 1999/05/06
- Re: operation x=x(:), John W. Eaton, 1999/05/06
- Re: operation x=x(:), A. Scottedward Hodel, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:), Jonathan King, 1999/05/05
- Re: operation x=x(:),
heberf <=
- Re: operation x=x(:), John W. Eaton, 1999/05/05