[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2
From: |
nikhil jain |
Subject: |
Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:51:41 +0530 |
Do you mean to not use -j ?
That means a single rule execution at a time. It takes 2 hours to build.
With -j4 it takes 1 hour.
I have -j kind of unlimited. So it usually takes around just 5 minutes to
build. Less than that sometimes.
What exactly is the bug ? And what is the fix in 4.2 ?
Thanks
Nikhil
Need help.
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, 03:58 Kaz Kylheku (gmake), <address@hidden>
wrote:
> On 2019-09-27 13:23, nikhil jain wrote:
> > Please reply. It is urgent for me to provide a Correct compiled product
> > to
> > my users.
> > I do not want to switch back to 3.81.
>
> Could this be related to parallelization with "-j <jobs>"?
>
> If you put a
>
> .NOTPARALLEL:
>
> declaration at the top of your Makefile, does the problem persist?
> If not, that could be a workaround.
>
>
- GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2019/09/27
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Kaz Kylheku (gmake), 2019/09/27
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2,
nikhil jain <=
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Tony Theodore, 2019/09/28
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2019/09/30
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Paul Smith, 2019/09/30
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2019/09/30
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Paul Smith, 2019/09/30
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, nikhil jain, 2019/09/30
- Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Kaz Kylheku (gmake), 2019/09/30
Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2, Christian Hujer, 2019/09/30