Re: GNATS feature requests

[Milan Zamazal]

>>>>> "RE" == Richard Earnshaw <address@hidden> writes:

    RE> It would also be useful for the canonical PR to contain a
    RE> reference to those PRs that are duplicates, just in case one of
    RE> them happens to have additional pertinent information.  A field
    RE> such as "duplicates: <pr-list>" would do this.

Yes, there should be some way of linking of both the problems (kind of
virtual merge).

Milan Zamazal

-- 
Here is my advice, don't try to program the bleeding edge for the
general populace unless you really, really, really like migraines.
                                                   Neal H. Walfield