Re: [help-gengetopt] Re: Gengetopt 2.21 enhancement suggestions

[J. David Bryan]

On 17 Oct 2007 at 18:53, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:

> However, 90 would not be a valid enum (since it starts with a number) so
> enum values should still be generated in some modified way...

Agreed.


> ...e.g., enum_90 or ENUM_90, that was my main problem... 

Maybe "rotate_arg_90" or "rotate_enum_90"?

("enum_<value>" would fail if two different options both had the same 
"<value>", and "rotate_<value>" would fail if the option value were "given" 
or "help" or "orig" or "arg".)


> however, I'll work on this

Thanks!

                                      -- Dave