[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision vision.rst

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Branch:         
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/11/13 17:03:15

Modified files:
        FutureVision   : vision.rst 

Log message:
        Edit refs

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst.diff?tr1=1.189&tr2=1.190&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst
diff -u manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.189 
manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.190
--- manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.189   Thu Nov 13 16:52:17 2003
+++ manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst Thu Nov 13 17:03:14 2003
@@ -455,9 +455,6 @@
 anything in such a visualization representing *all* the items
 a user stores in their computer seems bound to be a herculean task.
 
-XXXX Ontorama cloning technique!
-(`Eklund 2002`_)
-
 These visualizations are therefore not useful for using
 RDF as a hyperstructure as introduced above.
 However, it is quite possible to build focus+context
@@ -1101,27 +1098,29 @@
 on the same 2D plane graph-drawing package [#graphviz]_,
 and
 Ontorama (`Eklund 2002`_)
-uses a hyperbolic-like planar visualization.
+uses a hyperbolic-like planar visualization based on tree visualization and 
+*cloning* nodes that are in more than one place on the tree.
 
-Work on structure-based focus+context visualizations of graphs in 
-general was
-more popular with semantic networks in the late '80s, for
-example in the Cyc 
-SemNet (`Fairchild et al 1988`_) 
-projects, which allowed the user 
+Work on structure-based focus+context visualizations of graphs,
+such as we use, 
+was more popular with in the late '80s, related to, e.g., semantic networks
+(see, e.g., `Fairchild et al 1988`_, 
+`Utting and Yankelovich 1989`_,
+`Noik 1993`_).
+These visualizations allow the user 
 to navigate through the graph locally, with one node as the *focus*,
 and showing the neighbouring nodes as context.
-There is also a very different approach using boxes and
-containment for SemNet in (`Travers 1989`_).
-
 Later, a similar style of navigation and structural
 editing was also used in the commercial
-product TheBrain(XXXCite), to allow users to organize files 
+product TheBrain [#thebrain]_, to allow users to organize files 
 and items on their computers.
+There is also a very different approach to graph visualization
+using boxes and
+containment in (`Travers 1989`_).
 
 One of the most important things that is different in the visualizations
-presented in this article and the ones for example shown in 
-(`Utting and Yankelovich 1989`_) is that icons are not used
+presented in this article and the ones discussed above
+is that icons are not used
 to represent the neighborhood of an item or a document.
 In FenPDF, the articles and the canvases are never represented by 
 anything other than their image - no file icon, no title
@@ -1474,6 +1473,11 @@
 July 8th, 2000. Mail to the zzdev mailing list, available online in the archive
 as ``http://www.xanadu.com.au/mail/zzdev/msg02237.html``
 
+.. _`Noik 1993`:
+
+**Noik, E.G.,** (1993)
+"Exploring large hyperdocuments: fisheye views of nested networks".
+ACM Hypertext'93 proceedings, 192-205.
 
 .. _`Nürnberg et al (1996)`:
 
@@ -1700,7 +1704,7 @@
 
 .. [#graphviz] ``http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/``
 
-
+.. [#thebrain] ``http://www.thebrain.com``