gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision vision.rst


From: Tuomas J. Lukka
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/FutureVision vision.rst
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:36:09 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Branch:         
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/11/13 16:36:09

Modified files:
        FutureVision   : vision.rst 

Log message:
        Travers ref

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst.diff?tr1=1.185&tr2=1.186&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst
diff -u manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.185 
manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.186
--- manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst:1.185   Thu Nov 13 16:35:48 2003
+++ manuscripts/FutureVision/vision.rst Thu Nov 13 16:36:08 2003
@@ -1103,11 +1103,16 @@
 Ontorama (`Eklund 2002`_)
 uses a hyperbolic-like planar visualization.
 
-Work on structure-based focus+context visualizations of graphs was
+Work on structure-based focus+context visualizations of graphs in 
+general was
 more popular with semantic networks in the late '80s, for
-example in the Cyc (XXXCite) and SemNet (XXXCite) projects, which allowed the 
user 
+example in the Cyc 
+SemNet (XXXCite) 
+projects, which allowed the user 
 to navigate through the graph locally, with one node as the *focus*,
 and showing the neighbouring nodes as context.
+There is also a very different approach using boxes and
+containment for SemNet in (`Travers 1989`_).
 
 Later, a similar style of navigation and structural
 editing was also used in the commercial
@@ -1503,6 +1508,12 @@
 **Thüring, M., Hannemann, J., and Haake, J.,** (1995)
 "Hypermedia and Cognition: Designing for Comprehension".
 CACM 38(8) August, 37-66.
+
+.. _`Travers 1989`:
+
+**Travers, M.,** (1989)
+"A visual representation for knowledge structures".
+ACM Hypertext '89 proceedings, 147-158.
 
 .. _`Tzagarakis et al 2003`:
 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]