[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex

[Janne V. Kujala]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden>        03/03/30 14:19:38

Modified files:
        Paper          : paper.tex 

Log message:
        false positives

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.71&tr2=1.72&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.71 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.72
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.71    Sun Mar 30 12:39:21 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Sun Mar 30 14:19:37 2003
@@ -1268,10 +1268,6 @@
 
 In order to evaluate the recognizability of our procedurally generated
 textures, we need to have an appropriate comparison point.
-%
-%- need to compare to something
-%- can't generate an infinite supply 
-%  of images easily and there are too much semantics
 Pictures of natural objects would not provide a good comparsion,
 because they cannot be generated in infinite amounts from seed
 numbers and they would esasily yield undesirable semantic associations.
@@ -1279,8 +1275,6 @@
 even though the colors of even a small set of randomly chosen colors would 
 most likely not be discriminable.
 
-%even though know solid colors not really recognizable.
-
 Surely it would be hard to remember a large number of textures, too.
 However, the user does not have to remember all the textures;
 it suffices to learn the textures of the most often used documents
@@ -1377,7 +1371,8 @@
 %The recognition of solid colors was only almost statistically significantly 
 %better than random [F(1,4) = 5.7, p = .075].
 %Whereas ``correct > incorrect'' for textures: [F(1,4) = 24.7, p = .0077]
-The solid colors do not seem to have enough variation for unambiguous 
+The large number of false positives shows that
+solid colors do not have enough variation for unambiguous 
 recognition.
 % RT less for correct responses: [F(1,4) = 5.2, p = .082]
 % RT different for textures and colors: [F(1,4) = .0, p > .1]
@@ -1388,7 +1383,7 @@
 %also easily be associated with the document content.
 %
 Of course,
-the solid colors could facilitate recognition in the presence of other cues,
+solid colors could facilitate recognition in the presence of other cues,
 such as the text of the document. However, the recognition of
 similar-looking fragments of documents would still depend on conscious effort 
 on the user's part ---