[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex
From: |
Janne V. Kujala |
Subject: |
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:01:51 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/gzz
Module name: manuscripts
Changes by: Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden> 03/03/30 11:01:51
Modified files:
Paper : paper.tex
Log message:
exper
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.69&tr2=1.70&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.69 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.70
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.69 Sun Mar 30 09:06:20 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Sun Mar 30 11:01:51 2003
@@ -1304,11 +1304,11 @@
Five participants naïve to the hypothesis and our texturing work
performed the experiment in both conditions.
-\emph{Design and materials.}
+\emph{Stimuli.}
15 target backgrounds and 15 distractor backgrounds were randomly
chosen for both conditions.
The distribution of the solid colors was the same that is used for
-the colors of textures with the difference that the highest
+the texture colors except that the highest
lighness tail was de-emphasized to increase the otherwise low
discriminability of very light, unsaturated colors.
@@ -1354,13 +1354,16 @@
The results are summarized in Table~\ref{tableresults}.
A repeated measures analysis of variance indicates that
-the observed superiority of the textures is statistically
-significant [F(1,4) = 19.0, p = .012].
-% RT less for correct responses: [F(1,4) = 5.2, p = .082]
-%
-%The recognition performance of the textures was good while
+the average recognition performance is significantly better
+for the textures than for the solid colors [F(1,4) = 19.0, p = .012].
+%The recognition of solid colors was only almost statistically significantly
+%better than random [F(1,4) = 5.7, p = .075].
+%Whereas ``correct > incorrect'' for textures: [F(1,4) = 24.7, p = .0077]
The solid colors do not seem to have enough variation for unambiguous
recognition.
+% RT less for correct responses: [F(1,4) = 5.2, p = .082]
+% RT different for textures and colors: [F(1,4) = .0, p > .1]
+
%Our experience shows that at least the most recurring textures
%are not only recognized but can
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, (continued)
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/23
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/29
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/29
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/29
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/29
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/29
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/29
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/30
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex,
Janne V. Kujala <=
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/30
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/30
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/30
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/30
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/30
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/03/31
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/31
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/31
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/31
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/03/31