gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex


From: Janne V. Kujala
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:01:51 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden>        03/03/30 11:01:51

Modified files:
        Paper          : paper.tex 

Log message:
        exper

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.69&tr2=1.70&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.69 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.70
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.69    Sun Mar 30 09:06:20 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Sun Mar 30 11:01:51 2003
@@ -1304,11 +1304,11 @@
 Five participants naïve to the hypothesis and our texturing work
 performed the experiment in both conditions.
 
-\emph{Design and materials.}
+\emph{Stimuli.}
 15 target backgrounds and 15 distractor backgrounds were randomly
 chosen for both conditions.
 The distribution of the solid colors was the same that is used for 
-the colors of textures with the difference that the highest 
+the texture colors except that the highest 
 lighness tail was de-emphasized to increase the otherwise low
 discriminability of very light, unsaturated colors.
 
@@ -1354,13 +1354,16 @@
 
 The results are summarized in Table~\ref{tableresults}.
 A repeated measures analysis of variance indicates that
-the observed superiority of the textures is statistically 
-significant [F(1,4) = 19.0, p = .012].
-% RT less for correct responses: [F(1,4) = 5.2, p = .082]
-%
-%The recognition performance of the textures was good while
+the average recognition performance is significantly better
+for the textures than for the solid colors [F(1,4) = 19.0, p = .012].
+%The recognition of solid colors was only almost statistically significantly 
+%better than random [F(1,4) = 5.7, p = .075].
+%Whereas ``correct > incorrect'' for textures: [F(1,4) = 24.7, p = .0077]
 The solid colors do not seem to have enough variation for unambiguous 
 recognition.
+% RT less for correct responses: [F(1,4) = 5.2, p = .082]
+% RT different for textures and colors: [F(1,4) = .0, p > .1]
+
 
 %Our experience shows that at least the most recurring textures 
 %are not only recognized but can 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]