Re: About SWH, let avoid the wrong discussion

[Luis Felipe]

El 21/06/24 a las 10:44, MSavoritias escribió:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:46:56 +0200
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
>
> > Am Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:14:18AM +0300 schrieb MSavoritias:
> > > Aside from that even Guix uploading all code from the packages to
> > > SWH that basically feeds it to a LLM model is indeed not honoring consent of 
> > > the author of the package.
> > Guix does not upload code to SWH. It gives them a pointer to a public git
> > repository that SWH then harvests or not according to their rules (see my
> > reply to Dale yesterday). These are not the same things at all.
> This is bikeshedding and arguing on schemantics. Guix gives them a url to 
> download the source code from, so ultimately we (the Guix project) is 
> responsible for the code showing up in there.
> Lets not argue over schemantics like this. It is even posted on their website 
> in case you want to argue otherwise 
> https://www.softwareheritage.org/2019/04/18/software-heritage-and-gnu-guix-join-forces-to-enable-long-term-reproducibility/

I think the differentiation between sending code and sending a URL is 
necessary. Saying that Guix sends your code or your source files to SWH 
leads people to think that Guix *will* transmit those files from your 
local machine over the Internet to SWH machines when you run "guix lint 
YOUR_PRIVATE_PACKAGE". And that's not the case, is it?

OpenPGP_0x0AB0D067012F08C3.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature