El 21/06/24 a las 10:44, MSavoritias escribió:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:46:56 +0200
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
Am Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:14:18AM +0300 schrieb MSavoritias:
Aside from that even Guix uploading all code from the packages to
SWH that basically feeds it to a LLM model is indeed not honoring consent of
the author of the package.
Guix does not upload code to SWH. It gives them a pointer to a public git
repository that SWH then harvests or not according to their rules (see my
reply to Dale yesterday). These are not the same things at all.
This is bikeshedding and arguing on schemantics. Guix gives them a url to
download the source code from, so ultimately we (the Guix project) is
responsible for the code showing up in there.
Lets not argue over schemantics like this. It is even posted on their website
in case you want to argue otherwise
https://www.softwareheritage.org/2019/04/18/software-heritage-and-gnu-guix-join-forces-to-enable-long-term-reproducibility/
I think the differentiation between sending code and sending a URL is
necessary. Saying that Guix sends your code or your source files to SWH
leads people to think that Guix *will* transmit those files from your
local machine over the Internet to SWH machines when you run "guix lint
YOUR_PRIVATE_PACKAGE". And that's not the case, is it?