Re: About SWH, let avoid the wrong discussion

[MSavoritias]

On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:45:04 +0000
Luis Felipe <sirgazil@zoho.com> wrote:

> El 21/06/24 a las 10:44, MSavoritias escribió:
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:46:56 +0200
> > Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
> >  
> >> Am Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:14:18AM +0300 schrieb MSavoritias:  
> >>> Aside from that even Guix uploading all code from the packages to
> >>> SWH that basically feeds it to a LLM model is indeed not honoring consent 
> >>> of the author of the package.  
> >> Guix does not upload code to SWH. It gives them a pointer to a public git
> >> repository that SWH then harvests or not according to their rules (see my
> >> reply to Dale yesterday). These are not the same things at all.  
> > This is bikeshedding and arguing on schemantics. Guix gives them a url to 
> > download the source code from, so ultimately we (the Guix project) is 
> > responsible for the code showing up in there.
> > Lets not argue over schemantics like this. It is even posted on their 
> > website in case you want to argue otherwise 
> > https://www.softwareheritage.org/2019/04/18/software-heritage-and-gnu-guix-join-forces-to-enable-long-term-reproducibility/
> >   
> 
> I think the differentiation between sending code and sending a URL is 
> necessary. Saying that Guix sends your code or your source files to SWH 
> leads people to think that Guix *will* transmit those files from your 
> local machine over the Internet to SWH machines when you run "guix lint 
> YOUR_PRIVATE_PACKAGE". And that's not the case, is it?

But I didnt say that tho did I? the context you are reading as from the quote 
is Guix uploading all code from its packages to SWH.
Not any private repos. So i have no idea what you are reffering to here tbh.

MSavoritias