guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes


From: Yasuaki Kudo
Subject: Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 19:18:51 +0900

Hello!

I don't know the details of the case at all but let met mention this:
https://communityrule.info/
It comes from the world of worker cooperatives and I think them "rules of the community" is discussed a lot there as well 😄

Cheers,
Yasu

On May 1, 2021, at 18:16, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:

Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> writes:

Being a core committer is *not* a badge of honour. It does not give
special privileges beyond what is expected.

But this may not be true.  Quite a few people have expressed otherwise
over the years.

Maybe an issue is that much of the organizational structure of Guix is
implicit.  The roles are not well defined and as a result, they may
reach beyond what is commonly understood.

Some time ago, I was discussing the quetsion of implicit structure with
Ludo, who sent me this essay:

 https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm

I found it enlightening and quite relevant to the matter at hand.

Even if in the end my concerns end up being unjustified, I find it good
practice to always question the status quo: maybe something better could
come out of it! :)

Cheers!

--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]