[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes |
Date: |
Sat, 01 May 2021 11:15:56 +0200 |
Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> writes:
> Being a core committer is *not* a badge of honour. It does not give
> special privileges beyond what is expected.
But this may not be true. Quite a few people have expressed otherwise
over the years.
Maybe an issue is that much of the organizational structure of Guix is
implicit. The roles are not well defined and as a result, they may
reach beyond what is commonly understood.
Some time ago, I was discussing the quetsion of implicit structure with
Ludo, who sent me this essay:
https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
I found it enlightening and quite relevant to the matter at hand.
Even if in the end my concerns end up being unjustified, I find it good
practice to always question the status quo: maybe something better could
come out of it! :)
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature