[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2
From: |
Léo Le Bouter |
Subject: |
Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:34:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
In general my opinion is that backporting fixes is time-consuming and
that if we have to do it each time I wont be able to keep up with the
load. I'd rather update things to a version that already includes fixes
and is supported by upstream even at the cost of world rebuilds. I
can't deal with upstreams who either do not backport fixes, or don't
integrate fixes at all.
That's how I feel I can keep up with fixing security issues in GNU Guix
considering how overworked we are in general.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/19
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Julien Lepiller, 2021/03/19
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/21
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Andreas Enge, 2021/03/22
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Andreas Enge, 2021/03/23
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/23
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/23
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Mark H Weaver, 2021/03/23
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, Mark H Weaver, 2021/03/23
- Re: imagemagick@6.9.11-48 to graft or not to graft with 6.9.12-2, zimoun, 2021/03/24