[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:55:58 -0400 |
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:34:34PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> The question is: should the next release 1.2.1 contain zstd@1.4.9 as
> graft? Or do we revert the commit and simply fix it on core-updates
> and wait for the next core-updates cycle. Personally, I am in favor
> of the latter. WDYT?
The release should not contain any grafts, if we can help it.
On the wip-next-release branch, I've simply updated zstd to 1.4.9:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=wip-next-release
I do agree that updating this program 5 versions in a graft was perhaps
too much.
We should always try to cherry-pick bug-fix patches when grafting.
Otherwise the risk of breakage is too high. At least, these types of
patches should be reviewed on guix-patches. Léo, can you send them to
guix-patches in the future?
Sometimes it is okay to update things in a graft, but it depends on the
situation.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: GNU Guix (pull?) on i686 broke after zstd grafting, (continued)
Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, zimoun, 2021/03/16
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?,
Leo Famulari <=
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, zimoun, 2021/03/16
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/16
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/16
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, zimoun, 2021/03/16
Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/16
Security-czar needed? WAS: Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates?, Bengt Richter, 2021/03/16