[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"
|
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
|
Subject: |
Re: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t" |
|
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:09:09 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 |
Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> writes:
> Well, python-t should be unique, right? There can't be a collision on pypi.
> Well, except if that package is not on pypi?
Since it’s not a library we shouldn’t name it “python-<anything>”.
I agree with Tobias and others who suggested “t-todo-manager” or
similar; not “t-cli”, please.
--
Ricardo
- Opposition to new single-letter package name "t", Mark H Weaver, 2021/03/09
- Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), Taylan Kammer, 2021/03/09
- Re: Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), zimoun, 2021/03/09
- Re: Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/03/09
- Re: Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), zimoun, 2021/03/09