[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"
From: |
Leo Prikler |
Subject: |
Re: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t" |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 10:35:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2021, 01:08 -0500 schrieb Raghav Gururajan:
> > I like Mark's suggestion of "t-todo-list-manager" as well as
> > Raghav's suggestion for "t-cli"; in that order.
> >
> > Either name sounds good to me, though.
>
> Cool!
>
> Since, we already mention "todo list manager" in description, I
> think
> "ti-cli" is better.
I personally disagree. Let's assume we do have a collision and the
other program also happens to be a CLI – then we're back to square one.
Also, assuming it is a GUI instead of a CLI and the package can be
named "t-gui", there will be the implication that the two are related
when they need not be.
On a related note, the description treads awfully close to advertising
territory.
I'd say "t-todo-list-manager", perhaps shortened to "t-todos".
Alternatively, we might borrow some bits from the go-build-system
convention and name it com-stevelosh-t.
Regards,
Leo
- Opposition to new single-letter package name "t", Mark H Weaver, 2021/03/09
- Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), Taylan Kammer, 2021/03/09
- Re: Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), zimoun, 2021/03/09
- Re: Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/03/09
- Re: Search improvements (Was: Opposition to new single-letter package name "t"), zimoun, 2021/03/09