[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:40:02 +0200 |
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 at 18:34, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:
> FYI, our 'emacs-no-x-toolkit' package has a closure size of 390.9 MiB
> and does _not_ have the Gtk bug described above. That's why I use it.
Thank you for the information. It is worth knowing. I am currently
giving it a try.
However, I am still confused that the GNU Emacs package with default
options (--with-modules, --with-cairo, --disable-build-details)
depends on LLVM via GTK+ and Mesa; and not on only GNU tools. Is it
possible to build Emacs with Gtk compiled without LLVM?
All the best,
simon
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), (continued)
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Bengt Richter, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?),
zimoun <=
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29