[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)
From: |
Bonface M. K. |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Sep 2020 23:49:47 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:
> Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit!
>
Just tested it too, and it works for me too :)
> So I suggest we add the following packages:
>
> (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb
> (package
> (inherit emacs-xelb)
> (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb")
> (arguments
> (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments emacs-xelb)
> ((#:emacs emacs) `,emacs-no-x-toolkit)))))
>
> (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm
> (package
> (inherit emacs-exwm)
> (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm")
> (synopsis "Emacs X window manager (without X toolkit)")
> (propagated-inputs
> `(("emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb" ,emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb)))
> (arguments
> (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments emacs-exwm)
> ((#:emacs emacs) `,emacs-no-x-toolkit)))))
>
> Thoughts?
Wouldn't that be redundant? If you wanted to use
EXWM, we already have EXWM provided on MELPA, so
you could just set that up. That's IMHO though.
--
Bonface M. K. (https://www.bonfacemunyoki.com)
Chief Emacs Mchochezi / Twitter: @BonfaceKilz
GPG key = D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), (continued)
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/27
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/27
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?),
Bonface M. K. <=
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Bonface M. K., 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Bengt Richter, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28