Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers

[Pierre Neidhardt]

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> writes:

> Why wouldn't it help? Can't you make it a trie from basename ->
> complete name? If I'm looking for "libcord.so" (which is a key in the
> trie), I don't think I need to look for every path. I only need to
> follow the trie until I find a pointer to some structure that contains
> the data I look for (ex: a list of complete filenames).

Fair enough, but it's a more limited scope: here we assume the user
knows the exact basename.

It's a bit too limited in my opinion:

- It's only too common to have shared objects ending with a .X.Y extension
  (where X.Y is a version), the version-less file is not always present
  which means a lot of trial and error on the user end just to search
  the right file.

- It does not cover the case where I don't know the basename, e.g. if I'm
  looking for a FOO header file my query would look like "/include/.*foo.*".

I believe it's important that the search be as general as possible.

Thoughts?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature