[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:17:25 +0200 |
Hi,
Indeed, that was discussed at length but we still need to reach a
consensus :)
I personally disagree with the --export-manifest suggestion (which may
be one of the reasons why this is stalling :p).
Links to the related discussions (lots to read in there!):
- Store channel specification in profile:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-11/msg00464.html
In particular, from there:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02/msg00047.html
While I'm at it, Ludo, if you want to continue the discussion, we've
left it on Feb 25th with this question from me to you:
> I didn't understand from your previous message which downside you find
> to embedding the specifications.scm file. It would save efforts to the
> user and be more systematic, in the sense that it gives a guarantee to
> the user that a specifications.scm corresponds to a profile. This last
> point, I believe, is crucial.
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/11
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/13
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, zimoun, 2020/06/15
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/15
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/16
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/16
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, zimoun, 2020/06/16
- Re: Using --manfistest with <profile>/manifest files, elaexuotee, 2020/06/16
- how to "guix pack" a profile?, zimoun, 2020/06/17