[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Manual consistency
From: |
George Clemmer |
Subject: |
Re: Manual consistency |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:56:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> (from: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41253#10)
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 18:36, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> > There are many examples in guix.texi with $, and also many without. Plus
>> > some with # as the command line prompt.
>> I’ve come to the conclusion that snippets that contain only input should
>> be written without a prompt, for easier copy/pasting.
> I propose to do a pass on that:
> - apply this rule: no-$ for only input and $ to distinguish between
> inputs and outputs.
+1.
For examples w/ outputs, how about also removing the $ and commenting
the outputs with '# ', or '# > '?
HTH - George
- Re: Manual consistency, (continued)
- Re: Manual consistency, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/10
- Re: Manual consistency, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2020/06/10
- Re: Manual consistency, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/06/11
- Re: Manual consistency, Julien Lepiller, 2020/06/11
- Re: Manual consistency, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2020/06/11
- Re: Manual consistency, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/06/11
- Re: Manual consistency, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2020/06/11
Re: Manual consistency, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/06/05
Re: Manual consistency,
George Clemmer <=