[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?
|
From: |
zimoun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:18:53 +0100 |
Hi Ricardo,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:13, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> This is a misunderstanding. The Perl license says[1]:
Thank you for the pointer and the explanation.
All is clear and I am fine. :-)
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, zimoun, 2019/12/19
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/12/19
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/12/19
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, zimoun, 2019/12/19
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/12/19
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, zimoun, 2019/12/19
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/12/20
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, zimoun, 2019/12/20
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/12/20
- Guix and Bioconductor., Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/12/20