[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?
|
From: |
zimoun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:09:35 +0100 |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 18:04, Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> wrote:
> So the question is: shall we add --load-path to all commands instead?
> (If not already the case.)
Only commands that need it. :-)
Do you have in mind commands where the option --load-path is still missing?
Maybe "guix graph"?
Maybe "guix edit"?
- Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/18
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, zimoun, 2019/12/18
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Clément Lassieur, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/19
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?,
zimoun <=
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/19
- Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/12/26
- Re: Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/28
- Re: Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason?, zimoun, 2019/12/30
- Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH?, zimoun, 2019/12/19