[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iff?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: iff? |
Date: |
25 Apr 2001 02:26:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Jim Blandy <address@hidden> writes:
> Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> > And that may be a property worth trying to preserve. What about
> > something like
> >
> > (foo x) returns true if x is foo-like, #f otherwise.
>
> If you can fit it, more power to you.
>
> It's worth pointing out that the maintainers have to agree that this
> first-line-summary thing is a good policy,
Do we agree? I have no experience with Emacs.
In any case, how about extending the documentation system of Guile so
that it allows more explicit structure in the documentation than just
a single string. Neil proposed something along this line previously,
I think.
We could then have an explicit short text for `apropos', and a longer
one for `help'. Guile would then know when a short text is available
and people would know that they can provide such a thing (and how to
do it) by looking at existing documentation.
Like
(define (foo)
:short "Foo around."
"Foo around a little."
...)
If this is too tricky, what about having a special form `doc' that
applies to the current body (via special recognition in
scm_m_expand_body).
(define (foo)
(doc
:short "Foo around."
"Foo around a little.")
...)
- iff?, Masao Uebayashi, 2001/04/20
- Re: iff?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/20
- Re: iff?, thi, 2001/04/20
- Re: iff?, Yuk-Wah Wong, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Yuk-Wah Wong, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Keith Wright, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Jim Blandy, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: iff?, Jim Blandy, 2001/04/24
- Re: iff?,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: iff?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, Ivan Toshkov, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/30
- Re: iff?, Jim Blandy, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, thi, 2001/04/27
Re: iff?, Florian Weimer, 2001/04/25