[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iff?
From: |
Yuk-Wah Wong |
Subject: |
Re: iff? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:34:57 +0800 (CST) |
On 21 Apr 2001, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Return #t if ...; otherwise #f.
>
> Perhaps this would be clearer for people without a mathematical
> background?
This has an additional advantage of stating also the return value when the
condition is _not_ met. But well, 'iff' is always easier to type...
- iff?, Masao Uebayashi, 2001/04/20
- Re: iff?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/20
- Re: iff?, thi, 2001/04/20
- Re: iff?, Yuk-Wah Wong, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?,
Yuk-Wah Wong <=
- Re: iff?, Keith Wright, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Jim Blandy, 2001/04/21
- Re: iff?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: iff?, Jim Blandy, 2001/04/24
- Re: iff?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/24
- Re: iff?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, Ivan Toshkov, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/04/25
- Re: iff?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/30
- Re: iff?, Jim Blandy, 2001/04/25