[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MinGW patches
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: MinGW patches |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2014 20:06:05 +0200 |
> From: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:21:12 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> We generally rebase before pushing, to keep the git history as linear as
> >> reasonably possible.
> >
> > May I suggest to have this in HACKING, including the (probably
> > necessary) "pull --rebase" that should go with it?
>
> Sure, that makes sense. Would you like to propose a patch?
I could try, but I'm still largely a git newbie (my dVCS of choice is
bzr), so perhaps it would be better if someone else did that.
- Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW, (continued)
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Neil Jerram, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/23
- Re: MinGW patches,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18