[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:42:50 +0200 |
> From: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès), address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to
> > configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default
> > for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal.
>
> FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In
> the last couple of weeks, madsy on #guile reported cross-building a
> recent Guile snapshot (stable-2.0 branch) using MinGW
Which MinGW? It sounds like nowadays one needs to distinguish between
the various flavors. The exact port of pthreads and gc might also
matter.
> with thread support enabled and without --disable-posix, and it
> seems to work reasonably well. It runs the REPL without problems
> and passes much of the test suite.
Good to know; I hope to see a release some place near me in a
not-so-distant future, and will test this at that time.
- Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW, (continued)
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/23
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/23
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18