[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MinGW patches
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: MinGW patches |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:21:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> We generally rebase before pushing, to keep the git history as linear as
>> reasonably possible.
>
> May I suggest to have this in HACKING, including the (probably
> necessary) "pull --rebase" that should go with it?
Sure, that makes sense. Would you like to propose a patch?
Thanks,
Mark
- Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW, (continued)
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Neil Jerram, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/23
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18