[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions
From: |
Daniel Krueger |
Subject: |
Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:57:25 +0200 |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On a second thought guile do have an initital interpreter that is either a
> vm or a native no?
> Perhaps one can make use of that somehow!
Yeah, I thought about that too, but thought first that it would be
impossible. But if you first only compile the interpreter code
(without the VM), then create the C file with the instructions and
compile the VM it should work. I think .. ^^
- Daniel
- patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/15
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/17
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/17
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Daniel Krueger, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions,
Daniel Krueger <=
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/21