Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE

[Ludovic Courtès]

Han-Wen,

This patch:

  82ae1b8eb3413e6be6bd2aa032986fc7782e85ac
  Garbage collection cleanup.

  Makefile.am        |    8 
  gc-card.c          |  109 ++++++----
  gc-freelist.c      |  150 +++++++-------
  gc-malloc.c        |   24 +-
  gc-mark.c          |    8 
  gc-segment-table.c |  293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  gc-segment.c       |  545 
++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
  gc.c               |  261 ++++++++++---------------
  gc.h               |    2 
  inline.h           |   10 
  private-gc.h       |   92 +++-----
  11 files changed, 733 insertions(+), 769 deletions(-)

is kind of hard to review in a glimpse.  Does it just randomly "clean
things up" (whatever that means---it does not follow the GCS, for
instance), or does it fix anything?  It's hard to tell.  Can you
reproduce the heap usage graphs referred earlier in this thread?  Do
you have any evidence of improved behavior?  Is it this patch that
triggers the assertion failure you referred to in your first message?
Which assertion is it that fails?

I'm in favor or reverting it, possibly by changing the tip of the
affected branches so that the history remains clearer (sigh...).

When that is done, can you eventually resubmit it as a series of small
patches (like the ones you pushed), making it easier to identify the
fix, if there is one?

Thanks,
Ludovic.