[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3 |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:13:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> What other *star* names do we have? I can only think of *features*.
We don't have any other star name, but so far we did not export any
fluid, only getters and setters (e.g., `current-module'). The most
important thing is to be consistent with the naming scheme of those
getters and setters, no matter what naming convention we follow for
fluids. It turns out that star names are a convention for
dynamically-scoped variables in Common Lisp.
OTOH, http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention
suggests a different naming convention.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Marius Vollmer, 2005/12/06
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/13
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/17
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Marius Vollmer, 2005/12/17
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/29