[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
From: |
Tomas Zerolo |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:13:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:47:13PM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > OTOH, http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention
> > suggests a different naming convention.
>
> Now that really is a horrible convention. Hmm, how can we best
> confuse someone coming to Scheme from another language for the first
> time?
To be fair, they seem just to be reporting on current use (which is an
useful service).
Now I'm not implying to say that I like current use (which is somewhat
fragmented across Scheme implementations as well).
Regards
-- tomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Marius Vollmer, 2005/12/06
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/13
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3,
Tomas Zerolo <=
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/17
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Marius Vollmer, 2005/12/17
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/29