Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> This is in CVS now.

Thanks Neil!  BTW, what do you think of `*current-reader*' instead of
`current-reader' as a fluid name?  It would be more conventional and
consistent with the rest of Guile (e.g., `current-module' names a
procedure, not the fluid itself).

> Yes, sounds good.  The configurable 'load' reader may help us towards
> that goal, by allowing people to experiment easily with what kinds of
> reader configurability are useful, and what kind of API is convenient
> to control it.

Precisely, `guile-reader' is meant to be an equivalent of CL's read
table.

Thanks,
Ludovic.