[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Should we distribute libltdl? |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:20:27 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> What I would be happy with is to include a copy of libltdl in the
> Guile distribution but to have it completely ignored by configure
> and the Makefiles. When libltdl is not found in the system, a
> message could be printed that instructs the user to install libltdl,
> maybe by using the included sources.
Hmm. I wonder what the chance is that a user will be able to get hold
of the Guile source, but not the libltdl source. Is it high enough to
justify keeping a normally unused copy of libltdl in our tree?
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/07
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/07
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, rm, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, tomas, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08