[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16)
From: |
rm |
Subject: |
Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16) |
Date: |
Thu, 30 May 2002 20:05:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 07:45:06PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> The intent is more important than the list of files without the
> exception, I'd say. The LICENSE file is only there to inform users in
> a broad and global way, the details can be left to the individual
> files.
As i said before, this is not going to work if guile's intent is being
used as an embedeable scripting language. If i install libguile9 and
libguile-dev on Debian i simply don't _get_ the source files. Requesting
users of type 2 (programmers who embed guile in their application) to
always scan the sources (and do that regulary) doesn't seem to be a valid
solution.
Ralf Mattes
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), (continued)
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), rm, 2002/05/27
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), rm, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16),
rm <=
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28