Re: address@hidden: dynamic loading of native code modules]

[Marius Vollmer]

Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:

> However, I have a suggestion: If the lib is only to be used by the
> .scm module (using load-extension), I see no point in putting it in
> ${libdir}.  Instead it would be cleaner to be able to put it
> somewhere in ${libdir}/guile to avoid namespace cluttering in
> ${libdir} (which is, for example, (likely to be) indexed by the
> runtime linker on linux).

I don't see much risk in name collisions when we name our libs like
libguile-foo-bar.