[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IEEE Inf and NaN support for numbers.c
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: IEEE Inf and NaN support for numbers.c |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:59:04 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
"John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> writes:
> BTW, would people object to reformatting numbers.c to follow the GNU
> coding standards?
It wouldn't bother me, but I can't speak for everyone of course.
On a related note, I've been playing around here with replacing our
bignum support with gmp (and noticing some bugs that need fixing along
the way). The integration seems fairly easy (I've converted a lot of
the code in an very experimental tree), but I was wondering if you had
any thoughts on that front.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD