Re: IEEE Inf and NaN support for numbers.c

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

    Rob> On a related note, I've been playing around here with replacing our
    Rob> bignum support with gmp (and noticing some bugs that need fixing along
    Rob> the way).  The integration seems fairly easy (I've converted a lot of
    Rob> the code in an very experimental tree), but I was wondering if you had
    Rob> any thoughts on that front.

Technical issues aside (where I don't know enough to comment), I
believe that using gmp has been the intended plan for a couple of
years.

There was a bit of a skirmish on the subject of mismatched licenses
(Guile vs. GMP), but I remember it turning out to be a non-issue.

        Neil