[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: memory.text
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: memory.text |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:56:25 +0100 (MET) |
On 27 Nov 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On 25 Nov 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> >
> > > > What about naming the function scm_make_cell, or scm_new_cell?
> > >
> > > I named it scm_alloc_cell and scm_alloc_double_cell. Not sure if that
> > > are better names than yours...
> >
> > Ah, I hadn't realized that you already had submitted your patches. Still,
> > I like the scm_make_cell and scm_make_double_cell names better... Maybe
> > we should have a voting :-)
>
> Yeah, why not.
Then, I believe to have an even better suggestion: scm_cell and
scm_double_cell. Fits nicely with scm_string, scm_vector etc.
Best regards
Dirk Herrmann
- memory.text, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/23
- Re: memory.text, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/25
- Re: memory.text, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/25
- Re: memory.text, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/26
- Re: memory.text, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/26
- Re: memory.text, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/11/26
- Re: memory.text, Rob Browning, 2001/11/27
- Re: memory.text, Marius Vollmer, 2001/11/27
- Re: memory.text, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/11/27
- Re: memory.text,
Dirk Herrmann <=