Re: Please update the TODO with whatever is considered release critical.

[Marius Vollmer]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Though I agree that having a better migration path will be better for
> the users, we may want to balance how much we try to do against the
> benefits of getting the new version out, a version that *is*
> substantially improved over the old one, and against the costs of
> dividing development between two trees for too long.

Right.  What about having a `guiki', err, wiki to collect all the
porting hints that surface?

> If so, and if the changes that have gone into the main (development)
> branch since the 1.6 split haven't been too experimental, then we
> might want to consider the pros and cons of "unbranching" the stable
> release.

No, no.  The porting issues with the unstable branch are much worse
since the deprecated stuff has already been removed.