Re: GH. Again.

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

    Michael> regardless of the implementation, these are R5RS string
    Michael> functions (except for gh_init_guile).  I see no reason
    Michael> whatsoever to back them out, as I see no possibility of
    Michael> some Scheme implementation out there not being able to
    Michael> provide them.

    Michael> except for gh_init_guile, which is, indeed, totally
    Michael> unappropriate for GH.

Correct, but my argument is not about what is appropriate for GH.
It's about how to convey as clearly as possible the message that Guile
core is relinquishing responsibility for the GH interface and will not
be developing it further.

        Neil