Re: GH. Again.

[Marius Vollmer]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> I do still worry a bit about the GH users who'll be left unsupported,
> but going with a clean scm_ interface is undoubtedly the best approach
> for the future.
> 
> To avoid giving any further false impressions/hopes to those GH users,
> I think we should
> 
> - state clearly for how many more releases GH will be part of Guile
>   core  (I suggest 1.6.x and 1.8.x only.)
> 
> - for these releases, commit to supporting the GH interface as it was
>   at the time of the 1.4 release
> 
> - after these releases, commit to removing GH completely

Agreed.
 
> - remove anything that's been added to GH since 1.4, and don't add
>   anything else to it.

Why should we remove stuff?