[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GH. Again.
From: |
Sam Tregar |
Subject: |
Re: GH. Again. |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:11:35 -0400 (EDT) |
On 12 Jun 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> The summary: the GH interface is moved out of the central proper of
> Guile. It will be provided for quite some time, but only for
> compatibility reasons. We will steer people towards using (a cleaned
> up version of) the `scm_' interface.
Here here!
> Ultimately, the GH interface will end up in its own distribution,
> ready to be taken by anyone who wants to work on it.
Be brave - say it: let's kill the GH interface. If someone else wants the
name for a new project, then they can have it. It's not like it's such a
great name that we have to find it a home! I may be mistaken but it seems
to me that any cross-interpreter scheme API would have to start from
scratch anyway. Most of the current GH is just renamed scm_ functions and
thin C wrappers, all of which are dependent on the SCM type system.
-sam
- GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/11
- Re: GH. Again., Rob Browning, 2001/06/13
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/13
- Re: GH. Again., Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/14
- Re: GH. Again., Michael Livshin, 2001/06/14
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/14
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/14
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/14
Re: GH. Again.,
Sam Tregar <=
Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/14
- Re: GH. Again., Rob Browning, 2001/06/14
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/16
- Re: GH. Again., Bruce Korb, 2001/06/16
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Rob Browning, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/17