[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?
|
From: |
Dale P. Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:06:02 -0400 |
Michael Livshin wrote:
> I'd rather we figured a way to make the hygienic macro stuff fast
> enough...
Yes Please! How do other Schemes do it? Will using the new vm on the
current implementatin help?
-Dale
--
Dale P. Smith
Treasurer, Cleveland Linux Users Group http://cleveland.lug.net
Senior Systems Consultant, Altus Technologies Corporation
address@hidden
440-746-9000 x309
- Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25