[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary loadable files
|
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
|
Subject: |
Re: binary loadable files |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:00:00 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.96 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:53:49 +0100 (MET),
Dirk Herrmann wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I guess write-object / read-object might be the best in this sense.
>
> Well, these don't give any indication of their 'binary' nature. So what
> about write-object-binary / read-object-binary? A little bit verbose, but
> tells really all that is needed.
What about `binary-read' and `binary-write'? These might be better
because they indicate they use a different format than that of
`read' and `write', while taking the same types of arguments.
Kei
Re: binary loadable files, Dale P. Smith, 2001/01/30
Re: binary loadable files, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/01/30