[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary loadable files
|
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
|
Subject: |
Re: binary loadable files |
|
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:41:44 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.96 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:12:00 +0100 (MET),
Dirk Herrmann wrote:
>
> > What about `undump'?
>
> Since I agree that the read / write naming fits more nicely with the rest
> of the IO primitives, what about write-dump read-dump? It's more explicit
> than the suggested write-binary / read-binary, which could mean a lot of
> things, but still fits better than dump / undump.
Hmm, I guess write-object / read-object might be the best in this sense.
Kei
Re: binary loadable files, Dale P. Smith, 2001/01/30
Re: binary loadable files, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/01/30