[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :)
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :) |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:29:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.3.0 |
On 05.04.2014 18:49, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:45:30 +0200
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden> пишет:
>
>> A problem is that restgpr and [al]sh[lr]di3 weren't used by any
>> platform.
>
> What do you mean? They are used, but resolved from -lgcc for all
> current platforms. Where it breaks is ppc64le where libgcc for BE does
> not normally exist. And without -lgcc we get
>
> [ 152s] kern/powerpc/kernel_exec-dl.o: In function
> `grub_arch_dl_relocate_symbols':
> [ 152s]
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/grub-2.02~beta2/build/grub-core/../../grub-core/kern/powerpc/dl.c:167:
> undefined reference to `_restgpr_21_x'
> [ 152s] disk/ieee1275/kernel_exec-ofdisk.o: In function `grub_ofdisk_close':
> [ 152s]
> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/grub-2.02~beta2/build/grub-core/../../grub-core/disk/ieee1275/ofdisk.c:448:
> undefined reference to `_restgpr_29_x'
> ...
>
>
Not on my system. I use GCC 4.7.2. What version do you get this with?
>> Some other gcc versions probably use them. I'll need to figure
>> out on which platforms.
>
> Just set TARGET_LDFLAGS_STATIC_LIBGCC= and TARGET_LIBGCC= and try to
> compile. If you intend to replace libgcc by internal implementation,
> those flags are not needed anyway.
>
>> restgpr is definitely ppc-only.
>> [al]sh[lr]di3 I think was for arm.
>>>
>>>> For ppc only ucmpdi2 was needed actually.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Grub-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), (continued)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Dinar Valeev, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Dinar Valeev, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/04
- Message not available
- Fwd: Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :),
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/05
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/02