[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:22:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
New patch, after a bunch of misc cleanup, turning hardcoded numbers into
macros, improving comments, etc.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
qemu.diff
Description: Text Data
- Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port, (continued)
- [PATCH] rename kernel.elf to kernel.img (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/21
- [PATCH] swap real_to_prot() and prot_to_real() (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/21
- Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port,
Robert Millan <=
- [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/21
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/21
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22