[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:59:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:11:37AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 23:50, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > Nothing prevents you from writing a C library - the POSIX and C
> > standards are available independently. Yet the C library is under
> > LGPL. Also nothing prevents you from writing an ogg vorbis
> > implementation, but the FSF advocated the BSD license for ogg vorbis
> > however.
> >
> > What RMS said is that the GPL isn't an end itself. I agree with that,
> > and I think the BSD license is more suitable for the multiboot header
> > files and/or multiboot example kernel than the GPL.
>
> You are right at the point that we adopt weaker licenses by compromise from
> time to time. But you completely miss the point that code in GRUB is not
> meant to be used for other projects. So we have no reason to compromise in
> GRUB.
You completely miss the point that we want to have header files and
example code that can be used by other projects to implement
multiboot.
Jeroen Dekkers
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/11/15
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/11/24
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Tomáš Ebenlendr, 2006/11/26
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/11/26
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/11/28
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/11/28
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/11/28
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/11/29
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/11/26
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/11/28
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader,
Jeroen Dekkers <=
- Re: [RFC] multiboot2 loader, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/11/28